The Clean Energy Development Project Independent Industry Research
Research Methodology

What we know, how we know it, and what remains unresolved.

The Clean Energy Development Project studies Clean Energy Development Operations using project-level public data, company and entity research, and structured executive interviews. This page states how each of those inputs is handled and how evidence is classified.

Evidence classification

Every claim we publish carries one of four labels. The categories are not blurred, combined or implied: a participant's statement is never presented as a verified fact, and our own interpretation is never presented as either.

Verified fact

A statement traceable to an identified public source, dataset record or document that we can cite. The source and its vintage are named alongside the claim.

Participant statement

Something a research participant told us. It reflects their experience and their organization's practice. We do not represent it as an industry-wide condition, and we do not independently verify it unless we say so.

CEDP analysis

Our own processing of source data or interview material — filtering, normalization, aggregation, comparison. The inputs and the operations performed on them are stated so the work can be challenged.

CEDP inference

A judgment that goes beyond what the evidence strictly supports — a probable explanation, a working hypothesis, a direction we expect. Inference is labeled as such and is never counted as a finding.

CEDP analysis

The initial research universe

Our starting population is the project-level interconnection queue dataset published by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, containing records through year-end 2025. We filtered the complete queue for active status and for solar and/or battery technology.

6,735

active solar and/or battery-storage project records in the filtered universe

2,362

of those records identify a developer in the underlying dataset

1,618

source-derived developer identities undergoing entity resolution, after conservative normalization of those names

4,373

active project records carry no developer name in the source and require additional entity research

Filter applied
q_status = active
technology contains Solar and/or Battery
What these numbers are not

1,618 is a count of developer identities derived from source records, not a count of verified companies. Parent-company and entity resolution is in progress; the figure will move as it completes.

Source

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Queued Up 2026; CEDP analysis of active solar and battery-storage projects. Data through year-end 2025.

Berkeley Lab source & methodology — link pending

Research inputs

Five inputs, handled separately and reconciled deliberately rather than merged into a single dataset.

01

Project-level public data

Public interconnection queue records are the anchor. We preserve each source record as published — including the applicant name as it appears — and never overwrite it with our own interpretation.

02

Company & entity resolution

Queue records may name an operating developer, a subsidiary, a single-project entity, a utility or another applicant. Separately from the source record, we research which organization is responsible for development, and to which parent it belongs. Preliminary classifications are not published as industry statistics.

03

Executive research

For resolved organizations we identify the people accountable for development, commercial and interconnection work, using public professional sources. Personal contact details are not published.

04

Structured interviews

Interviews follow a consistent research instrument covering development profile, development cycle, systems, process friction and AI use — so answers can be compared across organizations. The published interview is editorial; the structured record behind it supports cross-organization analysis and is not published participant-by-participant.

05

Source verification

Before publication, each quantitative claim is checked against its named source and its vintage recorded. Claims that cannot be traced are either labeled as analysis or inference, or removed.

Corrections

We correct the record, visibly.

If a published fact, figure or attribution is wrong, we correct it and note what changed and when. Substantive corrections are marked on the item itself rather than edited away.

Corrections address — corrections contact pending founder review.

Methodology updates
v1.1 Initial research universe defined from the Berkeley Lab project-level queue dataset; evidence classification and corrections policy published. Sep 2026
v1.0 Research scope, pillars and interview program established. 2026

Each revision is dated and summarized here. Where a methodology change affects a published figure, the affected item is updated and its correction noted.

Editorial policy

Participation, permissions, attribution, conflicts and disclosure are governed separately from methodology.

Read the editorial policy
Forthcoming report

State of Clean Energy Development Operations 2026 applies this methodology across ten research sections.

See the report outline
Contribute

Development executives can contribute their perspective to the current research.

Participate in the Research